Free Shipping on Orders Over $75! Ends January 31st.

Your Trusted Brand for Over 35 Years

Life Extension Magazine

<< Back to October 2016

How Obvious Cures Are Overlooked

October 2016

By William Faloon

William Faloon
William Faloon

Seafarers were ravaged by scurvy until vitamin C was discovered to cure it.

History books imply that once sailors started consuming lemons or limes, scurvy disappeared.

That is not the way it happened.

Citrus was found to cure scurvy by Portuguese sailors in 1497. It was not until 1747 that a Scottish physician conducted a human study proving this.1

In 1799 all Royal Navy ships on foreign service were ordered to provide lemon juice—more than 50 years after it was scientifically proven.1

The British were in no hurry to disseminate these findings as it gave them the upper hand in sea battles. By consuming lemon juice during voyages, British sailors stayed heathy while their enemy counterparts suffered scurvy’s sickening, lethal impact.

By the 1870s, however, the “citrus cure” was discredited by British authorities for surprising reasons. For the next 60 years, scurvy continued to kill. This included men on Robert Scott’s 1911 expedition to the South Pole, and Dr. Scott was a Royal Navy surgeon!1

Scurvy afflicted people until vitamin C was isolated in 1932.2 It thus took over 400 years to be able to eliminate scurvy—long after citrus was “proven” to work in a controlled human study.

The cure for scurvy was discovered, forgotten, rediscovered, and forgotten again. This is analogous to what goes on today. Thousands of peer-reviewed published studies document how humans can protect against pathological aging.

Much of this data is ignored as if it does not exist. Our critics claim that nothing should be tried unless it’s “approved” by our bureaucratic overlords.

The 400-year delay in eradicating scurvy was ludicrous. Yet far more humans perish today because research findings are sadly overlooked.

When a news release questions the value of a particular therapy, the media rushes to create headlines that seldom reflect reality. As long as people focus on isolated opinions while ignoring the totality of evidence, medical progress will be impeded.

An example of this occurred across a 400-year span as a result of failure to use properly-stored citrus, which made it lose its vitamin C potency. This was one of several reasons why “experts” repudiated findings showing that fresh citrus cured scurvy.

The absurdity continues today. News headlines often blare that there is insufficient proof to supplement with higher-dose vitamin D.3,4 This nutrient was long ago demonstrated to help prevent falls and fractures.5-8 Higher blood levels of vitamin D are also associated with reduced cancer incidence.9-19

The documentation supporting vitamin D is robust, and you’d think there would be widespread use of this low-cost nutrient.

Instead, the blood of most people today is dangerously low in vitamin D, despite compelling evidence that vitamin D insufficiency contributes to many diseases.20-31

A correlation between scurvy and vitamin D is that there was never a downside for sailors to consume citrus, even while experts questioned its efficacy. Likewise, for vitamin D, whereby supplementing with 5,000 to 8,000 IU daily is safe for most aging individuals, yet “experts” constantly debate what the “optimal” dose is.

Scurvy and Aging
Scurvy and Aging
  • 1497: Citrus shown to cure scurvy
  • 1747: Dr. James Lind proves citrus cures scurvy
  • 1870: Citrus cure officially discredited
  • 1911: Dr. Robert Scott loses crew to scurvy
  • 1932: Vitamin C proven to cure scurvy

Millions of Deaths After Cure Discovered

Aspirin and Cancer

Aspirin and Cancer  

Most cancer patients should take a low-dose aspirin tablet daily. Studies show aspirin has multiple anti-cancer properties including helping to prevent metastasis.32-36

We long ago suggested that most cancer patients take a low-dose aspirin tablet daily based on a lot of impressive research.35,37-40 I’ve yet to hear a cancer patient tell me their oncologist recommended aspirin. We’ve observed this same problem for other drugs such as metformin41-53 and cimetidine.54-56

Rather than berate overworked physicians who are inundated with bureaucracy—we advocate for patient empowerment. This was difficult in the past, but it can be easy today. If you enter terms like “metformin and cancer” into Google, you’ll see some compelling research supporting the drug’s probable efficacy. That does not equate to absolute proof, but with over 1,600 Americans dying each day of cancer,57 potentially effective adjuvant therapies should be given more consideration.

Today’s Urgent Priority

Today’s Urgent Priority  

Educated consumers have access to many validated methods (healthy diets, hormones, nutrients, etc.) to guard against premature aging and degenerative illness.

Today’s priority should be to rapidly initiate human age-reversal studies. Failure to recognize “aging” as a treatable disorder is the major impediment stifling meaningful medical progress.

What excites us is that systemic age reversal has been demonstrated in the laboratory animal model.58-63 Physicians and scientists have developed protocols that translate these animal findings into clinical research protocols.

Holding back these critical studies is a lack of funding. Once physicians are able to induce meaningful age reversal, degenerative illnesses that kill 6,000 Americans daily will be postponed, if not eliminated—just as scurvy is today.

This month’s issue describes an initiative that we call the Project to Cure Aging. It involves raising funds to identify and validate age-reversal technologies and then rapidly translating them into medical practice.

You might think that if there are “obvious” ways to reverse human aging, then these would be utilized today. Yet all one has to do is look at how long it took the medical establishment to cure scurvy to understand why technology not only moves too slow, but sometimes falls backwards.

How Scurvy Cure was Lost

A series of accidents combined with misguided theories led to citrus being discredited in the 1870s. Over the next 60 years, scurvy returned to torment not just Polar explorers, but thousands of infants born to wealthy families in Europe and America.1

Interestingly, the reason why infantile scurvy was predominant among wealthy families is that poor families could not afford pasteurized milk. They had to rely on breast feeding.

Pasteurization (heating) destroys the vitamin C naturally contained in cow’s milk. Scurvy killed thousands of infants before vitamin C was discovered.

Vitamin C quickly breaks down in the presence of light, heat and air. It is absent from most preserved foods that have been cooked or dried. It is rapidly oxidized by copper ions, which may be one reason sailors, with their copper cooking vats, were particularly susceptible to vitamin deficiency.

Interestingly, our bodies are quite adept at conserving vitamin C in response to deficient intakes. It can take 6 months for scurvy to develop in healthy people after vitamin C is removed from the diet. It was long ago discovered that lemons and oranges were particularly effective in curing scurvy.

How Scurvy Kills

The classic first symptom of scurvy is inflamed, swollen gums. As the disease gains ground the gums become spongy and turn a purplish color, the teeth loosen and gum pain is severe.1

Spots start to appear on the legs and pain is felt in old wounds and bruises.

Edema (swelling with internal fluid) causes the legs and arms to become swollen and blacken behind the joints. At this point, the victim becomes incapacitated and dies a slow death as internal blood vessels start leaking because there is not enough vitamin C to maintain vascular structural integrity.

Scurvy severely and systemically destroys the body, yet the cure is so simple. Scurvy is caused by a deficiency in vitamin C.64 Humans need to obtain their vitamin C from outside sources (food, juice, supplements) because they cannot synthesize it internally like most mammals do.

Scurvy is rapidly cured by restoring vitamin C.

Confusing Limes for Lemons

Confusing Limes for Lemons  

After citrus was proven to cure scurvy and initially accepted by the medical authorities, the British mandated that sailors consume one ounce of lemon juice each day when at sea for over 2 weeks.

Back then, however, there was confusion between limes and lemons. Many thought lemon juice was the same as lime juice. There is less vitamin C in lime juice.

Scurvy had been the leading killer of sailors on long ocean voyages. By the mid-1800s, transportation advances were reducing the need for a scurvy preventative. Steam power shortened travel times, so that it was rare for sailors other than whalers to be months at sea without fresh food.

In 1860, the British began to replace lemon juice with an ineffective substitute—West Indian limes. One motive for this was political, i.e. it was better to buy from British plantations than to import lemons from Europe. There was confusion about what constituted a lemon or lime. Both “lemon” and “lime” were used interchangeably to describe “citrus.”

Delay in Curing Scurvy
Delay in Curing Scurvy

Before the 1930s, physicians were stymied because they had no idea that it was the vitamin C in citrus that was responsible for its curative powers.

An erroneous theory emerged back then that it was the acidity of citrus that cured scurvy. Since limes were more acidic, limes started being used in place of lemons. It was later found that limes have only about 25% the scurvy fighting power of lemons.

The lime juice being served to sailors in the mid-1800s was not fresh. It spent long periods in tanks open to the air and was pumped through copper tubing. Both of these processing methods caused the vitamin C to oxidize. Later experiments found this oxidized lime juice had no anti-scurvy powers, which was one reason why the “citrus cure” for scurvy was erroneously discredited in the 1870s.

So by the 1870s, most British ships that sailed were without scurvy protection. Only speed and improved nutrition on land were preventing sailors from getting sick.

Human Age-Reversal Research

Human Age-Reversal Research  

British sailors figured how to conquer scurvy, but then science went into reverse. From a medical history perspective, this is often a rule rather than the exception.

Be it cardiopulmonary resuscitation or inoculation against smallpox, effective means were discovered only to have the technology fall backwards or be seriously delayed.

One of the most intriguing possibilities for reversing human aging lies in infusing the plasma components found in young blood into older humans.58,65-67

Animal research using a similar technique (parabiosis) has consistently demonstrated age reversal.58,68,69 Parabiosis research peaked around 1972, but was then largely abandoned.70 The animal research picked up again after 2010 and even more compelling findings were discovered showing system-wide reversal of biological aging.71-78

There are physician-scientists that have ready-to-implement protocols to test if meaningful age reversal can be induced in older humans using young plasma transfer techniques. The impediment is lack of funding to launch their projects.

The article on page 32 of this month’s edition describes the Project to Cure Aging, which is the first attempt in medical history to discover a range of methods to induce biological age reversal in maturing humans.

This research should move forward without delay. We don’t want the next generation writing that scientists figured out how to reverse aging in 2016, but that delays in launching human studies caused us all to perish.

For longer life,

For Longer Life

William Faloon

References

  1. Available at: http://idlewords.com/2010/03/scott_and_scurvy.htm. Accessed July 20, 2016.
  2. Carpenter KJ. The discovery of vitamin C. Ann Nutr Metab. 2012;61(3):259-64.
  3. Available at: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/06/160616120528.htm. Accessed July 20, 2016.
  4. Available at: http://www.sciencealert.com/vitamin-d-tablets-may-be-worse-for-you-then-nothing-at-all. Accessed July 20, 2016.
  5. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dawson-Hughes B, Willett WC, et al. Effect of Vitamin D on falls: a meta-analysis. Jama. 2004;291(16):1999-2006.
  6. Trivedi DP, Doll R, Khaw KT. Effect of four monthly oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation on fractures and mortality in men and women living in the community: randomised double blind controlled trial. Bmj. 2003;326(7387):469.
  7. Annweiler C, Montero-Odasso M, Schott AM, et al. Fall prevention and vitamin D in the elderly: an overview of the key role of the non-bone effects. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010 Oct 11;7:50.
  8. Murad MH, Elamin KB, Abu Elnour NO, et al. Clinical review: The effect of vitamin D on falls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(10):2997-3006.
  9. Weinstein SJ, Purdue MP, Smith-Warner SA, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, vitamin D binding protein and risk of colorectal cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(6):E654-64.
  10. Gorham ED, Garland CF, Garland FC, et al. Vitamin D and prevention of colorectal cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;97(1-2):179-94.
  11. Wesa KM, Segal NH, Cronin AM, et al. Serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D and survival in advanced colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis. Nutr Cancer. 2015;67(3):424-30.
  12. Feskanich D, Ma J, Fuchs CS, et al. Plasma vitamin D metabolites and risk of colorectal cancer in women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13(9):1502-8.
  13. Ahonen MH, Tenkanen L, Teppo L, et al. Prostate cancer risk and prediagnostic serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (Finland). Cancer Causes Control. 2000;11(9):847-52.
  14. Janowsky EC, Lester GE, Weinberg CR, et al. Association between low levels of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and breast cancer risk. Public Health Nutr. 1999;2(3):283-91.
  15. Bilinski K, Boyages J. Association between 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and breast cancer risk in an Australian population: an observational case-control study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;137(2):599-607.
  16. Roskies M, Dolev Y, Caglar D, et al. Vitamin D deficiency as a potentially modifiable risk factor for thyroid cancer. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;41(3):160-3.
  17. Dormoy V, Beraud C, Lindner V, et al. Vitamin D3 triggers antitumor activity through targeting hedgehog signaling in human renal cell carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33(11):2084-93.
  18. Amaral AF, Mendez-Pertuz M, Munoz A, et al. Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) and bladder cancer risk according to tumor stage and FGFR3 status: a mechanism-based epidemiological study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(24):1897-904.
  19. Holick MF, Chen TC. Vitamin D deficiency: a worldwide problem with health consequences. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(4):1080s-6s.
  20. Littlejohns TJ, Henley WE, Lang IA, et al. Vitamin D and the risk of dementia and Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2014;83(10):920-8.
  21. Giovannucci E, Liu Y, Hollis BW, et al. 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risk of myocardial infarction in men: a prospective study. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(11):1174-80.
  22. Chiu KC, Chu A, Go VL, et al. Hypovitaminosis D is associated with insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(5):820-5.
  23. Mitri J, Dawson-Hughes B, Hu FB, et al. Effects of vitamin D and calcium supplementation on pancreatic beta cell function, insulin sensitivity, and glycemia in adults at high risk of diabetes: the Calcium and Vitamin D for Diabetes Mellitus (CaDDM) randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(2):486-94.
  24. Khan H, Kunutsor S, Franco OH, et al. Vitamin D, type 2 diabetes and other metabolic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Proc Nutr Soc. 2013;72(1):89-97.
  25. Agmon-Levin N, Theodor E, Segal RM, et al. Vitamin D in systemic and organ-specific autoimmune diseases. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2013;45(2):256-66.
  26. Hong Q, Xu J, Xu S, et al. Associations between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and disease activity, inflammatory cytokines and bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(11):1994-2001.
  27. Peng H, Li H, Li C, et al. Association between vitamin D insufficiency and elevated serum uric acid among middle-aged and elderly Chinese Han women. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61159.
  28. Dietrich T, Joshipura KJ, Dawson-Hughes B, et al. Association between serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and periodontal disease in the US population. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(1):108-13.
  29. Chaganti RK, Parimi N, Cawthon P, et al. Association of 25-hydroxyvitamin D with prevalent osteoarthritis of the hip in elderly men: the osteoporotic fractures in men study. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(2):511-4.
  30. Pierrot-Deseilligny C, Souberbielle JC. Contribution of vitamin D insufficiency to the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2013;6(2):81-116.
  31. Gloth FM, 3rd, Alam W, Hollis B. Vitamin D vs broad spectrum phototherapy in the treatment of seasonal affective disorder. J Nutr Health Aging. 1999;3(1):5-7.
  32. Zimmermann KC, Waterhouse NJ, Goldstein JC, et al. Aspirin induces apoptosis through release of cytochrome c from mitochondria. Neoplasia. 2000;2(6):505-13.
  33. Bellosillo B, Pique M, Barragan M, et al. Aspirin and salicylate induce apoptosis and activation of caspases in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Blood. 1998;92(4):1406-14.
  34. Rothwell PM, Wilson M, Price JF, et al. Effect of daily aspirin on risk of cancer metastasis: a study of incident cancers during randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2012;379(9826):1591-601.
  35. Rothwell PM, Wilson M, Elwin CE, et al. Long-term effect of aspirin on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: 20-year follow-up of five randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376(9754):1741-50.
  36. Algra AM, Rothwell PM. Effects of regular aspirin on long-term cancer incidence and metastasis: a systematic comparison of evidence from observational studies versus randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(5):518-27.
  37. Available at: http://www.lifeextension.com/Magazine/2011/5/The-Everyday-Drug-That-Prevents-Cancer-Death/Page-01. Accessed July 21, 2016.
  38. Rothwell PM, Fowkes FG, Belch JF, et al. Effect of daily aspirin on long-term risk of death due to cancer: analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;377(9759):31-41.
  39. Azarschab P, Al-Azzeh E, Kornberger W, et al. Aspirin promotes TFF2 gene activation in human gastric cancer cell lines. FEBS Lett. 2001;488(3):206-10.
  40. Paterson JR, Lawrence JR. Salicylic acid: a link between aspirin, diet and the prevention of colorectal cancer. Qjm. 2001;94(8):445-8.
  41. Libby G, Donnelly LA, Donnan PT, et al. New users of metformin are at low risk of incident cancer: a cohort study among people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(9):1620-5.
  42. Hirsch HA, Iliopoulos D, Tsichlis PN, et al. Metformin selectively targets cancer stem cells, and acts together with chemotherapy to block tumor growth and prolong remission. Cancer Res. 2009;69(19):7507-11.
  43. Gotlieb WH, Saumet J, Beauchamp MC, et al. In vitro metformin anti-neoplastic activity in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;110(2):246-50.
  44. Cantrell LA, Zhou C, Mendivil A, et al. Metformin is a potent inhibitor of endometrial cancer cell proliferation--implications for a novel treatment strategy. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116(1):92-8.
  45. Spratt DE, Zhang C, Zumsteg ZS, et al. Metformin and prostate cancer: reduced development of castration-resistant disease and prostate cancer mortality. Eur Urol. 2013;63(4):709-16.
  46. Memmott RM, Mercado JR, Maier CR, et al. Metformin prevents tobacco carcinogen--induced lung tumorigenesis. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2010;3(9):1066-76.
  47. Mohammed A, Janakiram NB, Brewer M, et al. Antidiabetic Drug Metformin Prevents Progression of Pancreatic Cancer by Targeting in Part Cancer Stem Cells and mTOR Signaling. Transl Oncol. 2013;6(6):649-59.
  48. Hadad SM, Hardie DG, Appleyard V, et al. Effects of metformin on breast cancer cell proliferation, the AMPK pathway and the cell cycle. Clin Transl Oncol. 2014;16(8):746-52.
  49. Yi G, He Z, Zhou X, et al. Low concentration of metformin induces a p53-dependent senescence in hepatoma cells via activation of the AMPK pathway. Int J Oncol. 2013;43(5):1503-10.
  50. Cerezo M, Tichet M, Abbe P, et al. Metformin blocks melanoma invasion and metastasis development in AMPK/p53-dependent manner. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12(8):1605-15.
  51. Zhang ZJ, Zheng ZJ, Kan H, et al. Reduced risk of colorectal cancer with metformin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(10):2323-8.
  52. Honjo S, Ajani JA, Scott AW, et al. Metformin sensitizes chemotherapy by targeting cancer stem cells and the mTOR pathway in esophageal cancer. Int J Oncol. 2014;45(2):567-74.
  53. Sandulache VC, Hamblin JS, Skinner HD, et al. Association between metformin use and improved survival in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2014;36(7):1039-43.
  54. Kobayashi K, Matsumoto S, Morishima T, et al. Cimetidine inhibits cancer cell adhesion to endothelial cells and prevents metastasis by blocking E-selectin expression. Cancer Res. 2000;60(14):3978-84.
  55. Tonnesen H, Knigge U, Bulow S, et al. Effect of cimetidine on survival after gastric cancer. Lancet. 1988;2(8618):990-2.
  56. Zheng Y, Xu M, Li X, et al. Cimetidine suppresses lung tumor growth in mice through proapoptosis of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Mol Immunol. 2013;54(1):74-83.
  57. Available at. Accessed July 26, 2016.
  58. Scudellari M. Ageing research: Blood to blood. Nature. 2015;517(7535):426-9.
  59. Finerty JC. Parabiosis in physiological studies. Physiol Rev. 1952;32(3):277-302.
  60. McCay CM, Pope F, Lunsford W. Experimental Prolongation of the Life Span. Bull NY Acad Med. 1956;32(2):91-101.
  61. McCay CM, Pope F, Lunsford W, et al. Parabiosis between old and young rats. Gerontologia. 1957;1(1):7-17.
  62. Horrington EM, Pope F, Lunsford W, et al. Age changes in the bones, blood pressure, and diseases of rats in parabiosis. Gerontologia. 1960;4:21-31.
  63. Conboy IM, Conboy MJ, Wagers AJ, et al. Rejuvenation of aged progenitor cells by exposure to a young systemic environment. Nature. 2005;433(7027):760-4.
  64. Available at: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/125350-overview. Accessed July 21, 2016.
  65. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/04/can-we-reverse-ageing-process-young-blood-older-people. Accessed July 21, 2016.
  66. Available at: http://www.lifeextension.com/magazine/2015/8/human-age-reversal-research/page-01. Accessed July 21, 2016.
  67. Castellano JM, Kirby ED, Wyss-Coray T. Blood-Borne Revitalization of the Aged Brain. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(10):1191-4.
  68. Available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/05/young-blood-renews-old-mice. Accessed July 21, 2016.
  69. Ludwig FC, Elashoff RM. Mortality in syngeneic rat parabionts of different chronological age. Trans N Y Acad Sci. 1972;34(7):582-7.
  70. Eggel A, Wyss-Coray T. A revival of parabiosis in biomedical research. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014;144:w13914.
  71. Bouchard J, Villeda SA. Aging and brain rejuvenation as systemic events. J Neurochem. 2015;132(1):5-19.
  72. Loffredo FS, Steinhauser ML, Jay SM, et al. Growth differentiation factor 11 is a circulating factor that reverses age-related cardiac hypertrophy. Cell. 2013;153(4):828-39.
  73. Sinha M, Jang YC, Oh J, et al. Restoring systemic GDF11 levels reverses age-related dysfunction in mouse skeletal muscle. Science. 2014;344(6184):649-52.
  74. Ruckh JM, Zhao JW, Shadrach JL, et al. Rejuvenation of regeneration in the aging central nervous system. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;10(1):96-103.
  75. Katsimpardi L, Litterman NK, Schein PA, et al. Vascular and neurogenic rejuvenation of the aging mouse brain by young systemic factors. Science. 2014;344(6184):630-4.
  76. Villeda SA, Plambeck KE, Middeldorp J, et al. Young blood reverses age-related impairments in cognitive function and synaptic plasticity in mice. Nat Med. 2014;20(6):659-63.
  77. Available at: http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2014/05/hope-for-aging-brains-skeletal-muscle/. Accessed July 21, 2016.
  78. Available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2013/05/nineteenth-century-technique-turns-old-mouse-hearts-young. Accessed July 21, 2016.