The $50.00 Toll BridgeApril 2004
By William Faloon
LE Magazine April 2004
|The $50.00 Toll Bridge|
Sometimes the only way to alert Americans to a disgraceful new law is to compare it to absurd situations that arise in other countries because of government ineptitude.
A front-page article in the Wall Street Journal reports that Japan’s highways are so heavily tolled that Japanese motorists go out of their way to drive on back roads. The result is enormous traffic congestion and lost productivity. In many parts of Japan, the highways sit empty while drivers meander around side streets to avoid the outlandish tolls. Driving the length of Japan costs $330, while it can cost $50 to cross a single bridge.1
The Japanese are often thought of as frugal and highly productive. While this characterization appears to be accurate as to the citizens of Japan, the Japanese government is no different from the US government when it comes to squandering taxpayer dollars through politically inspired policies.
The new Medicare bill is one such policy that will create economic havoc in the US for generations to come. Some estimate that this bill will cost trillions of taxpayer dollars.2,3 And because the federal government is already running a $500 billion deficit, the money must be borrowed to pay today’s inflated drug costs.
The Medicare bill will become the equivalent of the Japanese toll highways, with ordinary Americans bearing the economic burden of an artificial problem caused by needless government regulation.
Medicare Bill Vehemently Opposed
The Life Extension Buyers Club expended enormous resources to defeat this Medicare bill. We showed that it is nothing more than a taxpayer subsidy to the pharmaceutical industry and that prescription drug prices would plummet if Americans could import lower-priced medications from Canada and Europe.
We went even further and documented that there would be no drug price problem were it not for FDA over-regulation. We showed that prescription drug prices would drop to pennies a pill in a competitive market environment, as opposed to the FDA-protected drug monopoly that exists today. Tens of thousands of readers wrote their members of Congress, asking that a taxpayer subsidy for the drug cartel not be enacted into law. Below is an excerpt from the form letters so many Life Extension members sent to Congress:
“I don’t want my tax dollars used to further line the pockets of the drug companies. I therefore ask that you vote against any legislation that calls for taxpayers to subsidize the artificial high prices of prescription drugs. If Americans are free to purchase their drugs from other countries, prescription drug prices will plummet, thereby mitigating the need for tax dollars to be taken from consumers to pay for their prescription drugs.”
The new Medicare bill, which is an economic windfall for the drug industry, clearly shows that our government has capitulated to pharmaceutical lobbyists at the expense of ordinary citizens who will bear the burden of paying this needless debt.
The Medicare bill gives the government no rights or discretion to negotiate a better unit price with the drug cartel. This means that the drug companies’ biggest customer—the federal government—will pay conventional Medicare prices for prescription drugs, which are sometimes even higher than what individuals pay. In the business world, lower prices are negotiated for large, guaranteed product orders. Not so with the federal government. Because it is future taxpayers who will have to pick up the tab, little concern was shown for what price the government pays to subsidize drug prices.
To make matters worse, the Medicare bill is rife with bureaucratic complications that provide little benefit to many of those in need of affordable drugs. As is typical of government programs devised by special interest groups, lots of money will be wasted to accomplish relatively little, with horrendous economic consequences to pay in the future.
The FDA’s Insidious Role
To expose the incestuous relationship between the FDA and the pharmaceutical giants, we made hundreds of appearances on television and radio shows, mailed out millions of pieces of mail, ran full-page newspaper ads, and set up anti-FDA websites. We did all this to encourage consumers to “act up” against the blatant corruption that is bankrupting the nation’s health care system.
A focal point of our assertion that prescription drugs cost too much was that identical medications could be obtained in other countries for far less money. The FDA countered by contending that drugs imported from Europe and Canada are “dangerous.” We repeatedly showed that the FDA was misleading Congress and the public by making these false statements about the safety of prescription drugs sold in other countries.
On June 7, 2001, the FDA told Congress that it wanted to halt almost all small shipments of foreign drugs mailed to consumers in the US. The only exemption would be for compassionate use, so that seriously ill patients who have exhausted all approved treatments could order drugs from overseas. The FDA told Congress:
“We need to be able to make a blanket assessment that these things are not safe for American consumers and should be turned back.”4
In response to the FDA’s assertions, Life Extension sent Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests in June 2001 asking the FDA to substantiate its sworn testimony before Congress that drugs imported from other countries are dangerous. Although the FDA is legally mandated to respond to FOIA requests, it has ignored our repeated written requests and phone calls asking that it substantiate its sworn testimony about the alleged dangers of imported medications.
News Media Interrogate FDA
This FDA lobbying effort gave the news media a golden opportunity to cross-examine the FDA. It turns out that the FDA cannot name a single American who has been injured or killed by drugs bought from licensed Canadian pharmacies. For example, Tom McGinnis, the FDA’s director of pharmacy affairs, stated:
“I can’t think of one thing off the top of my head where somebody died or somebody got put in the hospital because of these medications. I just don’t know if there’s anything like that.”5
Neither does Health Canada, the Canadian equivalent of the FDA. The Canadian drug regulation agency says that it “does not have any information that would indicate that any Americans have become ill or have died as a result of taking prescription medications purchased from Canada.”5
In a news conference, the FDA commissioner stated that there are “thousands of examples of unapproved and potentially unsafe medications coming into the United States.”5 Yet in an interview with Ted Koppel on the ABC News program Nightline on November 5, 2003, the commissioner was repeatedly asked to name a single instance of an American being harmed by a Canadian drug—and could not come up with a single person. When asked if the FDA had any “anecdotal evidence” that an imported drug had harmed an American, the commissioner admitted that the agency had not even heard of anyone having a problem with an imported prescription drug from Canada.6
The news media are becoming increasingly skeptical of the FDA’s baseless claims. According to one news source:
“Concern that the FDA may be misleading consumers has hurt its credibility among some Capitol Hill lawmakers, who say the agency is carrying water for the powerful drug industry.”5
According to Rep. Dan Burton (D-CA), who chairs a House subcommittee that has studied the Canadian drug issue:
“I asked FDA Associate Commis-sioner William Hubbard to give me examples where people have been damaged by Canadian pharmaceuticals and reimportation, and he couldn’t even give me one example, not one.”5
The news media have humiliated FDA officials who are unable to point to a single case of harm occurring to anyone who has ever imported a drug from Canada or Europe. Despite losing more credibility each day, the FDA continues its cruel farce by issuing warnings about the purported dangers of offshore drugs. The sidebar on the next page is an excerpt of a warning that appears on the FDA’s website (www.fda.gov).
While the FDA claims to be a consumer protection agency, its actions clearly show that it is firmly in the pocket of the pharmaceutical industry. The Associated Press surveyed comparable US and Canadian prices for 10 popular drugs and found the Canadian prices were from 33% to 80% cheaper.7 Lower-income Americans who believe the FDA’s deception may not be able to afford medicine they need to stay alive, even though safe and affordable medications are available right across the border.
Cities and States Rebel
The FDA is warning that these cities and states are breaking the law by encouraging this “illegal” behavior. Local officials clearly see that the FDA’s motive is to protect the profits of the pharmaceutical industry instead of guarding the health of Americans. These maverick local and state officials are ignoring the FDA’s threats, despite warnings that the federal government might take legal action against them. The news media have described a “tea party” revolt as local governments disregard the FDA’s baseless assertions that people are being put at risk when buying Canadian medications.
Why the Medicare Bill Passed
According to Rep. Burton, who has extensively studied drug company lobbying efforts, the cost of the industry’s influence peddling exceeded $150 million in 2003. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that taxpayers alone will pay roughly $1.8 trillion for prescription drugs over the next 10 years—not including the additional $400+ billion provided in the new Medicare bill.9
These numbers clearly show that lobbying the government is a highly profitable endeavor for the drug industry. In return for the influence peddling, the government grants the drug companies a virtual monopoly to charge inflated prices while ordinary citizens are doing without food to pay these outrageous costs.
Drug lobbyists labored long and hard to craft the new Medicare bill so that it provides their industry with the greatest protection against the competitive forces of the free market. The drug import provision, which the House of Representatives had earlier passed, was stripped from the bill altogether so that no one in Congress could be accused of voting against the right of Americans to buy drugs from Canada and Europe. The Senate instead set up a special “committee” to “study” the safety issue further.
FDA and Drug Cartel Win This Battle
That Americans cannot legally buy their drugs from lower-cost Canadian pharmacies does not mean the practice will stop. It is, in fact, growing by leaps and bounds, as more Americans realize they can save big dollars by buying their medications offshore. What may emerge, however, are counterfeiters who will take advantage of there being no protective mechanism in place to guard Americans against unsafe medications from other countries. The original House bill had built-in safety requirements that would have made drugs imported from Canada safer than those available in most American pharmacies.