Are Fish Oil Supplements Safer Than Eating Fish?
By Debra Fulghum Bruce, PhD
Ensuring the Safety of Fish Oil Supplements
While there is no guarantee that the fish you eat is free of contaminants, the tide has turned when it comes to guaranteeing the safety of omega-3 fish oil supplements. In fact, recent studies substantiate that some supplements are safer than eating fish. For example, analyzing five brands of fish oil supplements, researchers from Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston found that levels of PCBs and organochlorine pesticides were below the detectable limit in all five brands tested. The study authors concluded that if a person were to eat fish from the Great Lakes at the optimal recommended amount of about 400 grams per week, he would consume at least 70 times more PCBs and 120 times more organochlorine pesticides than if he were to supplement with the average daily dose of fish oil (1.5 grams) for one week.24
With growing concerns about contamination and recent journal studies warning of the health effects of mercury and PCBs from marine sources, health-conscious consumers are demanding more information about the safety of the fish oil products they consume. Reputable fish oil products now undergo rigorous testing for purity and concentration by independent quality-assurance programs such as the International Fish Oil Standards (IFOS) program. Under the direction of Canada’s Nutrasource Diagnostics Inc., a world leader in omega-3 diagnostic testing and product analysis, the IFOS program measures the quality of omega-3 products in the context of global standards developed by the WHO and the Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN), a trade association for supplement suppliers and manufacturers. Oddly, FDA standards for allowable contaminants in fish oil are the least stringent of all of these organizations.
When a third-party laboratory performs an assay of fish oil products to determine whether the active agents meet the label claim, the technicians review the presence of contaminants in the product and check the rate of dissolution (how fast the product releases within a specific time), among other tests for purity and quality.
In testing for PCB, dioxin, and furan levels, the IFOS testing service uses the highly specialized technique of gas chromatography mass spectrometry.25 The fish oil’s omega-3 content is also tested as a percentage of weight using advanced gas chromatography techniques.26
The IFOS service tests mercury using cold water vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy. Heavy metals such as arsenic, nickel, cadmium, and lead are analyzed by microwave-assisted digestion in nitric acid.
After submitting fish oil to the most rigorous assay laboratory, the IFOS program compares the product to far more stringent standards than those established by the WHO or CRN. Testing fish oil at these far lower levels of detection affords consumers a much greater margin of safety. For example, the Council for Responsible Nutrition Voluntary Monograph allows a maximum mercury content in fish oil supplements of one-tenth of one (0.10) parts per million. The IFOS program tests the product at a far greater detection limit of 10 parts per billion to demonstrate to consumers a premium level of product purity and safety. While the CRN Voluntary Monograph allows a maximum PCB content of 0.09 of one part per million, the IFOS program tests product levels at an even greater detection limit in parts per trillion to provide for a much greater margin of safety.
Life Extension Products Attain Highest Rating
Life Extension’s fish oil supplements exceed the IFOS’s testing assay for EPA and DHA potency and purity, earning the highest possible rating, signifying an “exceptional product batch.”
Ratings are based on the CRN Voluntary Monograph standard or the WHO standard in each of the four categories shown below.
The IFOS report states that levels of PCBs, PCDDs (poly-chlorinated dibenzo-dioxins), and PCDFs (polychlorinated dibenzo-furans) in Life Extension’s fish oil supplements were well below the maximum allowed by the CRN and WHO. Moreover, Life Extension’s fish oil had no mercury, arsenic, lead, nickel, or cadmium content evident, and was under the CRN’s maximum allowable score for peroxide and oxidation, demonstrating the highest premium level of purity and safety.
Today, high levels of contaminants such as mercury, PCBs, and dioxins in our environment and waters make eating certain fish regularly a potentially risky dietary choice. This does not mean that fish meals should be avoided. Published studies clearly show health benefits for those who eat fish. The problem is that some people are overdoing it and eating too much of the wrong kinds of fish. Fortunately, the wealth of health benefits associated with fish consumption can be safely and readily obtained from premium fish oil supplements. Rigorous testing standards and unparalleled attention to quality help create safe, effective fish oil products for you and your family.
1. Waldman P. Mercury and tuna: US advise leaves lots of questions. Wall Street Journal. August 1, 2005.
2. Covington MB. Omega-3 fatty acids. Am Fam Physician. 2004 Jul 1;70(1):133-40.
3. Available at: http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2004-12-15-fish-oil-usat_x.htm. Accessed July 20, 2005.
4. Available at: http://www.cehn.org/cehn/WhatisPEH.html. Accessed July 27, 2005.
5. Weiss B, Landrigan PJ. The developing brain and the environment: an introduction. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Jun;108 Suppl 3373-374.
6. Jacobs MN, Covaci A, Gheorghe A, Schepens P. Time trend investigation of PCBs, PBDEs, and organochlorine pesticides in selected n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid rich dietary fish oil and vegetable oil supplements; nutritional relevance for human essential n-3 fatty acid requirements. J Agric Food Chem. 2004 Mar 24;52(6):1780-8.
7. Storelli MM, Storelli A, Marcotrigiano GO. Polychlorinated biphenyls, hexachlorobenzene, hexachlorocyclohexane isomers, and pesticide organochlorine residues in cod-liver oil dietary supplements. J Food Prot. 2004 Aug;67(8):1787-91.
8. Available at: http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc101.htm. Accessed July 28, 2005.
9. Salonen JT, Seppanen K, Nyyssonen K, et al. Intake of mercury from fish, lipid peroxidation, and the risk of myocardial infarction and coronary, cardiovascular, and any death in eastern Finnish men. Circulation. 1995 Feb 1;91(3):645-55.
10. Virtanen JK, Voutilainen S, Rissanen TH, et al. Mercury, fish oils, and risk of acute coronary events and cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, and all-cause mortality in men in eastern Finland. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005 Jan;25(1):228-33.
11. Nierenberg DW, Nordgren RE, Chang MB, et al. Delayed cerebellar disease and death after accidental exposure to dimethylmercury. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jun 4;338(23):1672-76.
12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Blood mercury levels in young children and childbearing-aged women—United States, 1999-2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004 Nov 5;53(43):1018-20.
13. Available at: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/admehg3.html. Accessed July 19, 2005.
14. Available at: http://www.fsai.ie/surveillance/ food/surveillance_food_summarydioxins.asp. Accessed July 28, 2005.
15. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/pbt/dioxins.htm. Accessed July 28, 2005.
16. Glynn AW, Atuma S, Aune M, Darnerud PO, Cnattingius S. Polychlorinated biphenyl congeners as markers of toxic equivalents of polychlorinated biphenyls, dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in breast milk. Environ Res. 2001 Jul;86(3):217-28.
17. Available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/ food/fs/sc/scf/out90_en.pdf. Accessed July 28, 2005.
18. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/pcb/effects.html. Accessed July 28, 2005.
19. Jacobson JL, Jacobson SW. Intellectual impairment in children exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls in utero. N Engl J Med. 1996 Sep 12;335(11):783-9.
20. Available at: http://www.foodsafetynetwork.ca/pesticides/endocrine-disruptors.htm. Accessed July 28, 2005.
21. Rignell-Hydbom A, Rylander L, Giwercman A, et al. Exposure to PCBs and p,p’-DDE and human sperm chromatin integrity. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Feb;113(2):175-9.
22. Jacobs MN, Covaci A, Schepens P. Investigation of selected persistent organic pollutants in farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), salmon aquaculture feed, and fish oil components of the feed. Environ Sci Technol. 2002 Jul 1;36(13):2797-805.
23. Hites RA, Foran JA, Carpenter DO, et al. Global assessment of organic contaminants in farmed salmon. Science. 2004 Jan 9;303(5655):226-9.
24. Melanson SF, Lewandrowski EL, Flood JG, Lewandrowski KB. Measurement of organochlorines in commercial over-the-counter fish oil preparations: implications for dietary and therapeutic recommendations for omega-3 fatty acids and a review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 Jan;129(1):74-7.
25. Available at: http://www.umd.umich.edu/casl/natsci/slc/slconline/GC/sld001.htm. Accessed July 28, 2005.
26. Available at: http://www.nutrasource.ca/ifos_new/index.cfm?section=ifostesting. Accessed July 28, 2005.