Free Shipping on All Orders $75 Or More!

Your Trusted Brand for Over 35 Years

Life Extension Magazine

<< Back to February 2006

Antioxidants, Mitochondrial Damage, and Human Aging

February 2006

By Edward R. Rosick, DO, MPH, MS

Throughout history, scientists have sought strategies for warding off the seemingly inevitable processes of aging and death. In recent decades, the free radical theory of aging has shed light on the degenerative changes that occur as people grow older.

This theory holds that the body produces reactive, unstable agents known as free radicals during normal metabolism and following exposure to ultraviolet light or environmental toxins. While natural antidotes to these free radicals—internally produced antioxidants—are abundant in youth, their levels decline with age. The imbalance between free radicals and the antioxidants needed to inactivate, or “quench,” them leads to a generalized state of oxidative stress that can damage lipids, proteins, DNA, and mitochondria throughout the body. Oxidative stress has been associated with myriad disease processes, including cancer, heart disease, and Alzheimer’s.

Scientific research suggests that minimizing deleterious free radical reactions by ensuring optimal antioxidant levels may hold the key to extending the healthy human life span. Studies have shown that people who live to be 100 years or older often demonstrate higher blood levels of antioxidants than their much younger counterparts. Furthermore, antioxidants may help protect against mitochondrial dysfunction, another harmful condition that commonly accompanies aging and disease states.

Numerous antioxidants—lipoic acid, green tea polyphenols, lycopene, and vitamins A, C, and E—have been associated with protection against many afflictions that commonly accompany aging, such as Alzheimer’s disease, muscle loss (sarcopenia), cataracts, and memory impairment. By protecting against the aberrant biochemical changes that occur with aging, antioxidants may thus represent a veritable fountain of youth.

Thirty years ago, most mainstream medical doctors viewed anti-aging medicine as sheer quackery. The accepted dogma of the time, taught in all medical schools, was that aging and its associated degenerative processes were unavoidable. Conditions such as such as memory loss, muscle degeneration, and vision deterioration were considered inevitable, not preventable. To even speak of ways to slow aging or prevent its physiological changes was akin to religious heresy in the Middle Ages.

Now, at the dawn of the twenty-first century, there seems to be a begrudging, reluctant, and yet very real change in mainstream medicine’s perception of anti-aging or age-management medicine. The reasons for this change are multifaceted and include:

  • An explosion in knowledge of the intricate biochemical and physiological processes involved in aging.
  • Growing demand from the rapidly aging, multimillion-strong baby-boomer generation for scientifically valid ways to ward off aging’s most debilitating effects. (By 2030, approximately 70 million Americans will be aged 65 or older, representing a doubling of this age group since 1998.)
  • Cover articles in mainstream publications such as TIME magazine that have seriously examined age-management medicine.
  • Multiple studies demonstrating that safe, readily available nutritional supplements may help counter many common diseases of aging such as heart disease, cancer, and Alzheimer’s, and may even retard the aging process itself.

How Do We Define Aging?

While most people can tell by sight alone whether someone is young or old, the medical community remains divided over what constitutes aging. The most widely accepted idea today is that aging is a multifactorial biochemical and physiological process that leads to overall cellular breakdown and death. Aging not only alters our physical appearance due to changes in skin, bones, and muscle tone, but also affects our internal organs. The heart and immune system become less efficient, and diseases that are rare in young people become increasingly more prevalent in older adults.

Several competing theories seek to explain which biochemical processes cause the physiological changes seen in aging. In one theory held in high regard by many gerontologists—the so-called “error theory of aging”—aging is primarily caused by external or environmental factors that inflict cellular damage, ultimately leading to organ damage and death. One way these “errors” can occur is through biochemical processes induced by the formation of free radicals, the unstable biochemical entities formed when energy is produced in the cells. While the body can partly neutralize the damaging effects of these radicals, its defenses become less efficient with advancing age. This can lead to damaged cells, tissues, and organs, which manifest as the physical declines of aging.

Free Radical-Induced Oxidative Damage

Free radicals are thought to cause cellular degeneration by means of a chemical process known as oxidation. The concept that free radical-induced oxidative damage is a major contributor to aging was first proposed in 1955 by Denham Harman, MD, PhD.1 Dr. Harman suggested that “the sum of the deleterious free radical reactions going on continuously throughout the cells and tissues constitutes the aging process or is a major contributor to it.”2

Another well-known scientist and proponent of the free radical theory of aging is Bruce Ames, PhD, a world-renowned researcher at the University of California, Berkeley. In multiple papers, Dr. Ames and his colleagues contend that “oxidant byproducts of normal metabolism cause extensive damage to DNA, protein, and lipid.” An increasing number of scientists argue that this damage (the same as that produced by radiation) is a major contributor to aging.3

Drs. Harman and Ames are not the only respected scientists to give credence to the free radical theory of aging. Numerous research papers detail the ways in which free radicals increase oxidative stress in aging humans and cause numerous disease states associated with aging.4-6 Besides damaging cells and organs, free radicals may adversely affect mitochondria, the organelles in each cell that literally provide the energy needed to sustain life.

Energy-Manufacturing Mitochondria

Mitochondria are specialized structures that produce energy by converting oxygen and nutrients into adenosine triphosphate, or ATP, an essential biochemical that powers the metabolic activities of the body’s cells.

Mitochondria are uniquely different from other cellular organelles in that they contain their own DNA, leading researchers to postulate that eons ago, mitochondria were free-living cells that were taken up and incorporated in larger organisms. Over a vast evolutionary time span, these two organisms developed a symbiotic relationship whereby the larger organism supplied the mitochondria with oxygen and nutrients, while the mitochondria supplied energy via the production of ATP.

The old adage that “there’s no such thing as a free lunch” applies to energy production by mitochondria. When energy is produced inside the mitochondrial membrane, free radicals, including superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide, are likewise produced. These radicals can inflict considerable damage to the cellular structure of mitochondria as well as to mitochondrial DNA.

How Free Radicals Damage Mitochondria

Many medical researchers now believe that free radical-induced oxidative damage is an important part of the aging process. Dr. Ames, Dr. Harman, and other scientists have written extensively on the biochemical mechanisms by which oxidative damage to mitochondria and mitochondrial DNA contributes to the decline in physiological function that defines aging.7-10

This process was succinctly summarized by researchers at National Yang-Ming University in Taipei, Taiwan, who wrote: “It has been shown that the rate of production of superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide in mitochondria increases with age. Moreover, the intracellular levels of antioxidants and activities of free radical-scavenging enzymes are significantly altered in the aging process. These two compounding factors lead to an age-dependent increase in . . . free radicals that may escape the various antioxidant defense mechanisms and cause ever-increasing oxidative damage to various biomolecules in mitochondria and the cell as a whole . . . we suggest that this vicious cycle plays an important role in human aging and in the pathogenesis of age-related degenerative diseases.”7

Indeed, multiple lines of evidence implicate free radicals in many of the diseases associated with aging, such as heart disease, vision loss, sarcopenia, cancer, and Alzheimer’s disease.

Antioxidants Retard the Aging Process

To further complicate matters, research has confirmed that levels of endogenous (internally generated) antioxidants—including superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase—decline with advancing age. The question is, what can be done to guard against the biochemical onslaught of free radicals?

One approach embraced by holistically oriented physicians and their patients is to increase daily intake of antioxidants—biochemicals that counteract the effects of free radicals—through dietary sources and nutritional supplements. While many mainstream physicians still scoff at this idea, a growing body of research validates the importance of supplementing with antioxidants.

Drs. Harman and Ames have proposed that antioxidants can help defend against many age-related diseases and perhaps against aging itself. According to Dr. Harman, “the free radical theory of aging predicts that the healthy life span can be increased by minimizing deleterious free radical reactions . . . the data now available indicate this can be done by keeping body weight down . . . while ingesting diets adequate in essential nutrients but designed to minimize random free radical reactions in the body. Such diets would [contain] minimal amounts of components prone to enhance free radical reactions . . . and increased amounts of substances capable of decreasing free radical reaction damage, such as alpha-tocopherol [vitamin E], ascorbic acid [vitamin C], selenium, and one or more of the synthetic antioxidants. It is reasonable to expect this approach will decrease the morbidity and mortality due to degenerative diseases and nonspecific age changes . . . so as to result in an extension of 5 or more years in the span of healthy productive life.”2

An Italian study in 2000 lends credence to Dr. Harman’s conclusions. Although blood levels of antioxidants tend to decrease with age, the Italian researchers found that centenarians (people aged 100 or older) had markedly higher blood levels of vitamins A and E than their younger counterparts. They concluded, “it is evident that healthy centenarians show a particular profile in which high levels of vitamin A and vitamin E seem to be important in guaranteeing their extreme longevity.”11